WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.020 --> 00:00:06.140
Good evening I'm Kate Riley- substituting
for Poppy Harlow. I do sports. You guys-

00:00:06.140 --> 00:00:11.820
you guys want to hear about sports? Great!
Because I got some news for you. I'm Kate

00:00:11.820 --> 00:00:16.080
Riley and I do sports you guys want to
hear 'bout sports?

00:00:26.400 --> 00:00:27.860
Serena Williams is in the

00:00:27.869 --> 00:00:30.420
news. Oh boy-
this happened a while ago, I'm

00:00:30.420 --> 00:00:34.410
surprised that more people are talking
about it cuz it's so funny

00:00:34.410 --> 00:00:38.210
there's just something automatically
hilarious about people getting upset

00:00:38.210 --> 00:00:43.469
While at the same time being wrong. Serena Williams was playing in the- US

00:00:43.469 --> 00:00:48.740
Open- I think... This is my job I should
know this... It was the finals and she was

00:00:48.740 --> 00:00:53.400
losing and one of her coaches did a hand
gesture to her

00:00:53.520 --> 00:00:55.900
which you're not allowed to do

00:01:09.280 --> 00:01:12.920
*clap *clap how noble so nice she would rather lose

00:01:15.920 --> 00:01:26.180
done her a favor second oh I'd rather I
don't cheat so she clearly saw it as

00:01:26.189 --> 00:01:30.509
well pointing out that you thought it
was a thumbs up now it's not a big deal

00:01:30.509 --> 00:01:34.560
basically all that happens was that she
got a warning that's how he works in

00:01:34.560 --> 00:01:39.570
tennis I didn't know this but you get
one warning and then after that the next

00:01:39.570 --> 00:01:45.360
rule violation you will lose a point and
then after that another rule violation

00:01:45.360 --> 00:01:49.170
you lose a game which is technically
four point I can't be bothered to get

00:01:49.170 --> 00:01:53.450
into there the point system of tennis

00:01:53.460 --> 00:02:00.030
so she continues to argue against the
umpire the guy that enforces the rules

00:02:00.030 --> 00:02:05.640
saying no I didn't cheat I didn't cheat
I didn't see him or whatever I didn't cheat

00:02:17.680 --> 00:02:27.760
so it ends there right
no no no she loses another game and breaks

00:02:27.760 --> 00:02:32.080
her racket and that guy's like that girl
broke her racket I used to play tennis a

00:02:32.080 --> 00:02:37.420
lot actually I grow up playing tennis I
I've competed in tennis no not on the

00:02:37.420 --> 00:02:42.250
level of Grand Slam okay but for anyone
to break a racquet is an extremely

00:02:42.250 --> 00:02:47.319
childish move and yeah it's not on the
same I never competed on nearly the same

00:02:47.319 --> 00:02:51.640
level but I've had opponents break their
rackets while playing against them it

00:02:51.640 --> 00:02:55.510
does happen and it's always just
cringe-worthy could be a problem that

00:02:55.510 --> 00:03:01.020
could be now that's a second rule
violation so that she loses a point and

00:03:01.020 --> 00:03:03.940
then that's when all hell breaks loose
for Serena

00:03:03.980 --> 00:03:08.680
Code violation racquet abuse point penalty Mrs. Williams

00:03:09.620 --> 00:03:13.740
you just sense that there was almost tears just about to erupt

00:03:13.740 --> 00:03:15.540
and then she got herself together

00:03:17.340 --> 00:03:18.460
*whinging

00:03:19.500 --> 00:03:24.000
but Serena won't have it so she goes up
to complain to the Umpire

00:03:24.000 --> 00:03:26.000
I didn't get coaching I didn't get coaching

00:03:27.000 --> 00:03:28.440
I didn't get coaching

00:03:28.440 --> 00:03:30.940
You need to make an announcement that I didn't get coaching

00:03:31.240 --> 00:03:35.240
so she didn't get coaching meanwhile well I mean I'm honest I was coaching

00:03:37.320 --> 00:03:42.500
he even said it himself yes I was coaching we have it on
video

00:03:42.500 --> 00:03:45.580
I don't cheat, I didn't get coaching, How can you say that?

00:03:46.090 --> 00:03:53.900
hOw CaN yOu saY tHAt? You need to-  You- You owe me an apology YOU OWE ME AN APOLOGY I HAVE NEVER CHEATED IN MY LIFE

00:03:53.989 --> 00:03:59.090
so what's her reason behind not cheating

00:04:01.909 --> 00:04:07.859
you see if you're a mother you cannot be
wrong and you cannot cheat yes of course

00:04:07.859 --> 00:04:12.260
that makes so much sense yass queen YASS

00:04:17.060 --> 00:04:21.920
she keeps saying he owes her an apology
even though she clearly broke the rules

00:04:21.920 --> 00:04:26.990
I gotta say the umpire is being very
patient with her especially how much

00:04:26.990 --> 00:04:28.040
she's yelling at him

00:04:33.500 --> 00:04:36.000
YOU ARE THE L I A R .

00:04:36.460 --> 00:04:41.420
he's like alright alright she's crazy
but then she of course has to push it

00:04:41.420 --> 00:04:43.570
too far

00:04:43.570 --> 00:04:45.570
YOU OWE ME AN APOLOGY x33

00:05:07.970 --> 00:05:14.190
so she calls him a thief and he said
okay well enough this is this is verbal

00:05:14.190 --> 00:05:17.220
abuse and she loses a game which is a
big deal

00:05:17.220 --> 00:05:21.000
and maybe a point yeah that's a big deal
but losing a game that's a huge he

00:05:21.000 --> 00:05:36.390
called him a thief so she uses a point
that other men get away with way worse

00:05:36.390 --> 00:05:41.000
behavior and what she did wasn't nearly
as bad

00:05:45.520 --> 00:05:50.740
now here's the thing she's clearly a
bully and a terrible loser she was

00:05:50.740 --> 00:05:54.639
losing the match regardless of what
happened she already lost against the

00:05:54.639 --> 00:05:58.539
same player before it's just the whole
thing is just embarrassing and a lot of

00:05:58.539 --> 00:06:04.120
news covering this story traded it like
it was the umpires fault and saying that

00:06:04.120 --> 00:06:08.289
umpire treated her differently than a
male player so they agree with her

00:06:08.289 --> 00:06:13.000
sentiment that this was sexism CNN
posting that Serena Williams is being

00:06:13.000 --> 00:06:18.460
punished for speaking her truth through
knaves right to claim sexism Tarina

00:06:18.460 --> 00:06:23.229
williams thailand offended umpire black
women everywhere know what that's like

00:06:23.229 --> 00:06:28.300
so some form of racism was involved
getting the full truth of the story was

00:06:28.300 --> 00:06:32.650
really hard because a lot of articles
ignore the fact that she broke a racquet

00:06:32.650 --> 00:06:37.569
and completely focused on the fact that
she got coaching which is more of a not

00:06:37.569 --> 00:06:43.000
so cut-and-dry thing because maybe she
didn't see it maybe she did even though

00:06:43.000 --> 00:06:47.770
she clearly did admit seeing it anyway
in the beginning she is wrong she's just

00:06:47.770 --> 00:06:53.020
objectively wrong that umpire has a
track record of being very harsh with

00:06:53.020 --> 00:06:59.169
the rules and he was following the rules
he treats women and men equal equal but

00:06:59.169 --> 00:07:04.479
as we talked about this specific
incident in question serena williams was

00:07:04.479 --> 00:07:07.719
wrong
somebody has to say it so I will

00:07:07.719 --> 00:07:14.169
Djokovic given fault on his serve for
time violation given a cold violation as

00:07:14.169 --> 00:07:21.069
well for conduct after yelling saying
French Open 2017 time violation given to

00:07:21.069 --> 00:07:25.690
Rafael Nadal he thought it was
selectively enforced that he complained

00:07:25.690 --> 00:07:30.909
about this same official Carlos Ramos
2018 this year in Webb at Wimbledon

00:07:30.909 --> 00:07:36.430
Djokovic again receives a cold violation
why was slamming his racquet into the

00:07:36.430 --> 00:07:39.969
ground so you know a lot of people say a
lot of dumb things when they're upset

00:07:39.969 --> 00:07:46.090
when you get emotional you sort of let
your better judgment is light which I

00:07:46.090 --> 00:07:51.880
can't relate to whatsoever what did she
do afterwards back Serena buddy if you

00:07:51.880 --> 00:07:56.050
could change one thing you know about
what occurred if you could change one

00:07:56.050 --> 00:08:00.040
thing what we
you changed Serina I don't know I don't

00:08:00.040 --> 00:08:05.380
you definitely can't go back in time but
I've seen other men call other empires

00:08:05.380 --> 00:08:10.090
several things I'm here fighting for
women's rights and for women's equality

00:08:10.090 --> 00:08:18.130
and for all kinds of stuff for all kinds
of stuff how can you fight for women's

00:08:18.130 --> 00:08:23.169
equality and how can you reinforce this
statement even afterwards when you

00:08:23.169 --> 00:08:28.780
literally stole from another woman the
whole show that's right the person that

00:08:28.780 --> 00:08:43.360
beat you at tennis felt like she had to
apologize no problem and while giving

00:08:43.360 --> 00:08:48.580
the award the audience was booing
completely ruining the show for her and

00:08:48.580 --> 00:08:59.380
you're telling me you're fighting for
women like hottie here

00:08:59.380 --> 00:09:05.110
it's really upsetting seeing how much
attention and poor display of character

00:09:05.110 --> 00:09:10.120
from Serena has drawn all the attention
away from Naomi's victory I think it's

00:09:10.120 --> 00:09:13.420
so stupid
that's just my opinion wish I'm not

00:09:13.420 --> 00:09:17.980
supposed to give someone told me I don't
know I don't know how things work around

00:09:17.980 --> 00:09:20.770
here
I'm new the next new just comes from

00:09:20.770 --> 00:09:24.700
t-series that's right you're sick of by
hearing about it all right this is not a

00:09:24.700 --> 00:09:29.800
story this is not nothing don't listen
to this I just want to ask you guys

00:09:29.800 --> 00:09:36.040
because on my reddit there's been a lot
of posts talking about how if you create

00:09:36.040 --> 00:09:41.650
an account in India or the Middle East
you will be automatically subscribed to

00:09:41.650 --> 00:09:47.080
t-series at first I thought no that's
impossible there's no way that would

00:09:47.080 --> 00:09:51.580
actually be a thing but then I see more
and more people talking about it saying

00:09:51.580 --> 00:09:55.810
that it did happen to it so I wanted to
ask if you guys could send if you guys

00:09:55.810 --> 00:10:01.060
noticed this please send evidence maybe
create an account in India to test it or

00:10:01.060 --> 00:10:03.970
something like that because I'm curious
because it would definitely be

00:10:03.970 --> 00:10:08.860
interesting but it is such a large
question mark on the whole channel how

00:10:08.860 --> 00:10:12.730
can a channel that has so many
subscribers and gaining subscribers so

00:10:12.730 --> 00:10:20.200
quickly get so little views on some
videos the final knows yeah boy

00:10:20.200 --> 00:10:25.000
yesterday a study came out talking about
YouTube that's right another one of

00:10:25.000 --> 00:10:29.440
those how interesting
it's over 40 pages long I read it I'll

00:10:29.440 --> 00:10:34.660
summarize it in this study they coined
the term alternative influence network

00:10:34.660 --> 00:10:41.050
and these are people that are political
influencers that sell far-right ideology

00:10:41.050 --> 00:10:47.530
and they drew this hilarious they drew
this map of of all these political

00:10:47.530 --> 00:10:52.120
commentators to sort of draw in a line
between all right so if you're watching

00:10:52.120 --> 00:10:57.550
Jordan Peter next you're watching Dave
Rubin and then you're going over to

00:10:57.550 --> 00:11:01.829
roaming millennial and then BAM you're
to the Nazis is start off with a

00:11:01.829 --> 00:11:06.869
harmless video but before you know what
you're completely radicalized so what do

00:11:06.869 --> 00:11:12.209
they base this analysis on well because
they collaborate that's right everybody

00:11:12.209 --> 00:11:18.119
on YouTube people collaborate who would
have thought I had no idea is that a

00:11:18.119 --> 00:11:21.959
thing people collaborate does that
happen in every single sub community on

00:11:21.959 --> 00:11:27.899
YouTube as well no I never heard of it
never happens so stupid most of these

00:11:27.899 --> 00:11:32.999
names as far as I've deduced I don't
know aren't even far-right commentators

00:11:32.999 --> 00:11:37.739
it's just a label to put on them for the
sake of convenience and by that measure

00:11:37.739 --> 00:11:42.720
I'm surprised I wasn't in this a lot of
times people call me far-right even

00:11:42.720 --> 00:11:47.699
though I never explicitly said any right
wing political view beyond any social

00:11:47.699 --> 00:11:52.919
politics this whole this whole diet this
whole image reminds me oh that mean you

00:11:52.919 --> 00:11:57.049
know where the football coach touches
his balls and then

00:11:57.049 --> 00:12:03.479
it's the same thing really great study
there also enforcing that YouTube must

00:12:03.479 --> 00:12:09.509
respond they must responds with policies
against these influencers so this study

00:12:09.509 --> 00:12:13.979
isn't just a study it's also calling to
action towards you to to make something

00:12:13.979 --> 00:12:18.809
about this I could go into deep details
but I can't no one cares they talk about

00:12:18.809 --> 00:12:24.479
how mainstream legacy media have built
credibility through fact-checking while

00:12:24.479 --> 00:12:29.999
this study gets simple facts wrong
drawing lines between collaborations and

00:12:29.999 --> 00:12:33.269
interactions that never have occurred
they talk about how these YouTube

00:12:33.269 --> 00:12:38.489
influencers use controversy to sort of
boost themself and for monetary gains

00:12:38.489 --> 00:12:43.049
which of course mainstream media has
never done they never use controversies

00:12:43.049 --> 00:12:49.889
to thrive themself upon these things
literally the verge headline on this

00:12:49.889 --> 00:12:55.049
incident was how white supremacists are
thriving on YouTube that's not what the

00:12:55.049 --> 00:13:00.119
study is saying even if we try to reach
that sentiment they also point out a lot

00:13:00.119 --> 00:13:04.829
of times I counted eight times they
point out how they focus on luring in

00:13:04.829 --> 00:13:09.950
young audiences it's all
tricking those young kids into becoming

00:13:09.950 --> 00:13:15.380
radicalised and these different ideas
political commentators on YouTube don't

00:13:15.380 --> 00:13:21.350
exist to lure people or young kids in as
this seems to elude they exist because

00:13:21.350 --> 00:13:26.029
people want to consume them people want
to hear other people's take on things

00:13:26.029 --> 00:13:29.899
because they literally can't get it
anywhere else a lot of times we

00:13:29.899 --> 00:13:33.829
mainstream media you they have the exact
same take on things and you really have

00:13:33.829 --> 00:13:38.000
to dig deeper to get the full story and
it's the same thing with reviews of any

00:13:38.000 --> 00:13:41.990
sort I think there's been a shift where
people want to hear what other people

00:13:41.990 --> 00:13:47.320
are saying I'd much rather hear a
YouTube reviewer talk about a video game

00:13:47.320 --> 00:13:54.230
than faceless company evaluating a game
a lot of these political commentators on

00:13:54.230 --> 00:13:58.670
YouTube are a lot more cut-and-dry
you either pick the virtuous stance or

00:13:58.670 --> 00:14:02.839
you take the stance that you believe is
more objective and there's just no

00:14:02.839 --> 00:14:05.420
in-between
a lot of these social politics really

00:14:05.420 --> 00:14:12.560
just feels like a schoolyard banter in a
grown-up manner all your your bad no no

00:14:12.560 --> 00:14:18.800
your bad it's all about who's evil and
who isn't I'm Kate Riley and you watched

00:14:18.800 --> 00:14:22.960
Pew News I'm Kate Riley and you've just
been riled up I like that

00:14:22.960 --> 00:14:23.460
-news music intensifies

00:14:23.460 --> 00:14:24.960
why am i even doing this