WEBVTT Kind: captions Language: en 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.180 Top of the morning to you laddies and you're watching PEW NEWS 00:00:04.380 --> 00:00:06.140 PEWPEWPEWPEWPEWPEWPEWP 00:00:06.480 --> 00:00:09.400 [PEW NEWS INTRO] 00:00:16.440 --> 00:00:20.100 Good evening I'm Gloria Borger. You're watching Pew News, the most 00:00:20.200 --> 00:00:20.700 reputdual ... bul 00:00:21.000 --> 00:00:23.060 trustworthy news site on YouTube 00:00:23.619 --> 00:00:30.059 Speaking of YouTube, our first story comes from YouTube. Over here at YouTube, someone commented: 00:00:30.060 --> 00:00:34.640 "Why aren't my videos showing up in chronological order in the sub box anymore." 00:00:34.680 --> 00:00:41.820 Team Youtube responded "Just to clarify, we are currently experimenting how to show content in the subs feed. 00:00:41.940 --> 00:00:48.760 Now, I'm GLORIA BORGER I'm supposed to remain unbiased and not keep my opinion in this news show but 00:00:49.320 --> 00:00:51.940 (Pain) 00:00:53.200 --> 00:00:55.200 That seems like a terrible idea. *laughs* 00:00:55.719 --> 00:01:02.099 Oh man, YouTube has just changed so many things over the years that none of the creators wanted and none of the users seems to want either 00:01:02.100 --> 00:01:06.360 but they've always just moved ahead with it anyway, and usually it's fine. 00:01:06.360 --> 00:01:14.069 But the subscription box has been the last bastion- the last stronghold of YouTube that hadn't been altered with there 00:01:14.070 --> 00:01:15.930 Hasn't been changed in a way 00:01:15.930 --> 00:01:19.300 that it is so confusing to find videos from a certain person in 00:01:19.300 --> 00:01:25.860 recommended tab and Home tab and trending tab and all these things that no one really wants but they are there anywhere and in a 00:01:25.860 --> 00:01:28.560 Way, they're kind of nice, but just don't touch the subscription feed. 00:01:28.740 --> 00:01:32.660 To be fair, they did say that they're just experimenting but also then to 00:01:32.780 --> 00:01:33.680 also then to 00:01:33.740 --> 00:01:36.020 be fair. They're probably going to implement this 00:01:36.020 --> 00:01:36.600 *JUHJUHJAH* 00:01:36.600 --> 00:01:39.940 And they mentioned that this is a very small experiment and we're testing. 00:01:40.360 --> 00:01:41.360 Completely optional. 00:01:41.580 --> 00:01:47.160 Ethan Klein made the argument that it's a slippery slope if they keep going in this sort of direction 00:01:47.229 --> 00:01:49.499 it's eventually going to lead to the demise of 00:01:49.720 --> 00:01:54.269 YouTube kind of like how Facebook is right now and I'd be lying if I said I didn't see it 00:01:54.269 --> 00:01:58.000 But I have to be- I'll be honest as well because I'm Gloria Borger always honest. 00:01:58.000 --> 00:02:02.600 A lot of times people get outraged with update s and they're not really as bad as everyone thinks. 00:02:02.600 --> 00:02:05.300 I don't know how it looks like so I can't really say that: 00:02:05.300 --> 00:02:09.820 *pewds mocking voice* "Oh, this is the worst. It's the end of YouTube. I don't know because I'm so 00:02:10.400 --> 00:02:12.780 unbiased and great." 00:02:12.780 --> 00:02:14.020 PEWPEWPEWPEWPEWPEW 00:02:14.020 --> 00:02:16.860 Remember vice? That's right. Vice the self-proclaimed 00:02:17.570 --> 00:02:23.529 "Coolest magazine in the world," the head of Vice quoted "They understand how millennials think, 00:02:23.870 --> 00:02:29.769 what content millennials want," which is why they have been hosting Rick and Morty incest porn [jesus christ] and 00:02:30.200 --> 00:02:34.060 For the love of God don't meme Childish Gambino type of articles. 00:02:34.060 --> 00:02:37.560 Now I ridiculed Vice last week and... 00:02:37.880 --> 00:02:41.590 I guess I upset them D: I'm sorry Vice. But Vice decided 00:02:41.590 --> 00:02:46.320 "Hey, let's prove him wrong by posting the most garbage article I have ever seen." 00:02:46.330 --> 00:02:46.900 *POOMF* 00:02:46.900 --> 00:02:49.160 "Pewdiepie!" I even did this *does the face* face 00:02:49.280 --> 00:02:53.700 *Headline voice* "Pewdiepie is teaching his audience that women are asking for it" 00:02:53.900 --> 00:02:57.880 Yes, remember that video everyone remembers that video right?! 00:02:58.100 --> 00:03:00.120 remember when Pewdiepie said that 00:03:00.320 --> 00:03:02.720 *nods in remembrance and agreement* 00:03:02.980 --> 00:03:04.180 of course :) 00:03:04.300 --> 00:03:08.640 What's even more hilarious is that I tweeted out the actual video that was in question 00:03:09.040 --> 00:03:10.920 So people can just watch it themselves 00:03:10.920 --> 00:03:16.900 And apparently I tweeted the wrong video and none other than the editor-in-chief of Vice responded: 00:03:16.900 --> 00:03:18.500 "Tweeted the wrong video bud..." 00:03:18.500 --> 00:03:20.600 *chuckle* Got you, bud. 00:03:20.600 --> 00:03:24.000 "..sorry we reported verbatim your comments" 00:03:24.000 --> 00:03:29.200 That's right. Verbatim my comments where I said women are asking for it 00:03:29.240 --> 00:03:32.600 That's exactly what I said. Just like you wrote in the headline. 00:03:32.600 --> 00:03:36.400 Thank you, Jason. Thank You Vice for your journalistic integrity 00:03:36.480 --> 00:03:41.400 Thank you for not just understanding what how millennial think, but also what they want 00:03:41.400 --> 00:03:45.400 But most of all thank you for varbating my comments. So eloquently. 00:03:45.400 --> 00:03:46.800 Absolutely asst- 00:03:46.800 --> 00:03:51.180 astounding work. Well done. This whole article this is so painfully... 00:03:51.680 --> 00:03:53.100 UHHH? One-sided 00:03:53.100 --> 00:04:00.560 It's offensive because it insinuates that somehow I said that it's okay to harass or sexually assault or even worse 00:04:01.440 --> 00:04:05.200 Women, because of what they wear - Never said this. 00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:08.950 Now, the amount of people that just criticizes article is absolutely beautiful 00:04:08.950 --> 00:04:15.059 I've never seen so many people stand up against one article and this was even before I tweeted about it 00:04:15.060 --> 00:04:21.500 It's funny to me how a website that claimed that they know how Millennials think and what content they want 00:04:21.500 --> 00:04:24.540 can be so disconnected from their own audience 00:04:24.540 --> 00:04:25.700 Absolutely, beautiful 00:04:25.700 --> 00:04:29.400 Now, I don't think I even need to respond but just for the sake of the lulz 00:04:29.560 --> 00:04:30.800 Let's just do it anyway 00:04:30.800 --> 00:04:37.140 "In his latest video on the subject uploaded Wednesday, Kjellberg chastised Alinity for filing the claim, 00:04:37.300 --> 00:04:41.000 and suggested that Alinity somehow deserves the abuse she is getting." 00:04:41.000 --> 00:04:43.400 [Sarcams] Yes, that's exactly what I was saying. 00:04:43.410 --> 00:04:46.859 I said she deserves criticism for abusing copyright law. 00:04:47.050 --> 00:04:51.200 There's something very wrong with that and you should be allowed to be criticized. 00:04:51.400 --> 00:04:54.800 Yes It's the Internet and there will be a small percentage of harassment. 00:04:54.800 --> 00:05:00.000 It's unfortunate and I never said anyone deserves that. That's ridiculous. 00:05:00.000 --> 00:05:02.039 "... the abuse she's getting online for wearing revealing clothes. 00:05:02.170 --> 00:05:07.860 He shows example of times when she wore a sheer top and her bra straps showed" 00:05:11.800 --> 00:05:15.019 This is insinuating that I still have a somehow have a problem with 00:05:15.539 --> 00:05:19.400 people wearing bras showing their bra strap or a sheer top. 00:05:19.400 --> 00:05:20.779 Just flat out lie. 00:05:20.779 --> 00:05:26.838 I never even brought this up and it's insinuating that I some have over a problem with someone showing their bra strap 00:05:26.839 --> 00:05:30.500 Which is ridiculous. Never argued this point - complete lie. 00:05:30.740 --> 00:05:35.000 Then mentioning that I mentioned that you plays just dance in just a dress. 00:05:35.000 --> 00:05:40.159 I mentioned a lot of examples of really promiscuous behavior and 00:05:40.649 --> 00:05:44.719 They decided to pick one of them as if I'm arguing that one point. 00:05:45.100 --> 00:05:46.500 Well done, Vice. 00:05:46.600 --> 00:05:49.500 Then later on in the article they call me out 00:05:49.500 --> 00:05:52.000 for taking things out of context. 00:05:52.000 --> 00:05:53.200 You can't make this stuff up. >:( 00:05:53.200 --> 00:06:00.320 The whole article is basically just straw men arguing me while completely ignoring any false of the other party 00:06:00.400 --> 00:06:01.660 It's ridiculous. 00:06:01.700 --> 00:06:05.120 What I'm doing isn't just "opportunistic and gross" 00:06:06.400 --> 00:06:08.760 What do I have to gain from any of this!? 00:06:10.400 --> 00:06:11.800 Do you understand!? 00:06:11.800 --> 00:06:16.179 What she did was opportunistic and gross. I think you got that one wrong? 00:06:16.179 --> 00:06:16.999 *laughs* 00:06:16.999 --> 00:06:24.759 Striking videos for money is opportunistic and gross. They go on and just completely ignores everything 00:06:25.340 --> 00:06:30.399 Alinity did because they said but none of this is really about copyright battle 00:06:30.400 --> 00:06:37.749 it's about women who stream on Twitch convenient device to just ignore everything bad that they did so they could just talk about 00:06:38.629 --> 00:06:45.459 Women on Twitch. I would love I would love if I got that treatment. That would just be absolutely great. Imagine if I 00:06:46.580 --> 00:06:51.180 Abuse copyright law on another person. Imagine how the media would react to that 00:06:51.680 --> 00:06:58.060 Imagine if I would boast about it as I'm making a lot of money doing it. I'm sure that would receive great reception 00:06:58.360 --> 00:07:02.360 Imagine if I admitted marriage fraud. I wonder how people will think about that 00:07:02.920 --> 00:07:07.140 Imagine (yes... imagine) if I dropped the n-word and said, it's okay. I'm ten percent black 00:07:07.150 --> 00:07:10.760 I'm sure people would just let that slide because you know, it's not about that 00:07:11.479 --> 00:07:13.069 imagine if I I 00:07:13.069 --> 00:07:16.569 Admitted that YouTube was giving me special favors in the rules 00:07:16.569 --> 00:07:21.128 I'm sure no one would ever comment about that because it's not about that. It's about 00:07:21.680 --> 00:07:23.120 debating on my 00:07:23.120 --> 00:07:24.560 Comments. Yes 00:07:24.560 --> 00:07:25.220 UMM 00:07:25.220 --> 00:07:29.139 They arguing that to understand how old is escalated 00:07:29.140 --> 00:07:35.640 You need to be familiar with which fail genre of videos go to youtube type twitch fails in the search box 00:07:36.320 --> 00:07:37.700 [puts on his smart boi's glasses] 00:07:39.740 --> 00:07:47.280 Okay, I don't think you understand the problem that you're trying to argue against because you tell me to Google Twitch fails actual 00:07:47.570 --> 00:07:52.240 Someone that does porn softcore porn shows up as an example 00:07:52.240 --> 00:07:55.659 I don't think you intentionally did this but you did 00:07:55.659 --> 00:07:56.330 HÆ 00:07:56.330 --> 00:08:03.849 and that's the problem with Twitch because actual cam girls and actual porn stars go to twitch to 00:08:04.280 --> 00:08:06.280 promote promiscuous behavior 00:08:06.380 --> 00:08:14.640 Overshadowing actual normal female streamers who just want to play games and just want to be treated like a normal streamer well done for making 00:08:14.650 --> 00:08:20.590 An example now I even said I don't have a problem with them doing this. For example, that was a streamer 00:08:20.590 --> 00:08:26.739 That seemed really cool and seemed really chill that just wanted to become partner on Twitch. She's been screaming for a year and 00:08:26.739 --> 00:08:27.410 and uh 00:08:27.410 --> 00:08:32.619 She hasn't gotten a partnership and she agrees with my point in the video or at least parts of it 00:08:32.620 --> 00:08:38.349 I'm just pushing my bra together to show how a push-up bra works. That's your fault for seeing it 00:08:39.200 --> 00:08:41.289 [Girl streamer (itsskylol)] Literally because of these kind of girls 00:08:42.320 --> 00:08:47.770 People come to the stream and they expect the same thing. But literally they are just in the wrong page 00:08:48.470 --> 00:08:55.269 Not every girl streamer like that and it tilts me because these like particular girls give you that 00:08:56.080 --> 00:08:58.120 Impression and it's so annoying 00:08:58.120 --> 00:09:00.540 [Pewds continues] And this video got completely blown up. They went viral 00:09:00.580 --> 00:09:01.420 It got a million views. 00:09:01.420 --> 00:09:07.960 So she's doing really well now so I'm really glad that I actually was able to help throughout all this mess at least someone 00:09:08.460 --> 00:09:08.960 uhh 00:09:08.960 --> 00:09:10.960 That seemed somewhat decent 00:09:10.960 --> 00:09:11.480 hæ 00:09:11.480 --> 00:09:13.900 After the backlash from Kjellberg's response 00:09:14.510 --> 00:09:19.689 She apologized. SHE apologized? Oh, okay. That's really interesting 00:09:20.120 --> 00:09:22.750 This is so painfully one-sided. I 00:09:23.750 --> 00:09:29.530 Apologize because I wanted to let Alinity go. I won I didn't want her to receive any more hate 00:09:29.530 --> 00:09:31.300 I didn't want it to receive anymore a harassment 00:09:31.300 --> 00:09:37.930 I thought I gave her an opportunity to just settle it but apparently she apologized. Well done. Vice well done 00:09:37.930 --> 00:09:40.960 *Royalty Free clapping effect* 00:09:41.300 --> 00:09:43.100 [Random woman] Now that is what this is all about 00:09:43.100 --> 00:09:44.800 Removing harassment from gaming. 00:09:45.060 --> 00:09:48.200 [Pewds] This is the reason why no one listens to you anymore. This is a reason why 00:09:48.540 --> 00:09:49.040 uhhh 00:09:49.050 --> 00:09:53.630 You cried wolf too many times. And yes, you may get some clicks throughout this article 00:09:53.640 --> 00:09:54.290 And yes 00:09:54.290 --> 00:09:59.060 You all pat yourself your on your back because you think you did a noble cause and standing up for this issue 00:09:59.240 --> 00:10:04.580 when in reality, you've done nothing but the complete opposite and embarrass yourself and your entire brand 00:10:04.940 --> 00:10:05.820 Congratulations 00:10:05.820 --> 00:10:07.020 PEWPEWPEWPEWPE- 00:10:07.020 --> 00:10:11.270 Next 👏 news 👏 really ties in well with this. Elon Musk, a person 00:10:11.270 --> 00:10:18.289 I really admire *AW* with incredible projects like SpaceX and Tesla he's had some problems with the media recently as well 00:10:18.289 --> 00:10:20.420 He tweeted out this the holier-than-thou 00:10:20.780 --> 00:10:28.580 Hypocrisy with big media companies who lay claim to the true but publish only enough to sugarcoat the lie is why the public no longer 00:10:28.800 --> 00:10:31.040 Respects them it sounds like he's completely 00:10:31.280 --> 00:10:33.020 describing my situation 00:10:33.020 --> 00:10:34.920 This is literally the same thing 00:10:34.920 --> 00:10:40.820 This was based on an article from The Washington Post that posted about Tesla a pilot slams into truck 00:10:41.220 --> 00:10:48.170 Stop at red light Elon Musk saying it's super messed up that tests like crash resulting in a broken ankle 00:10:48.480 --> 00:10:52.880 Is front-page news and the 40,000 people who died in u.s 00:10:52.880 --> 00:10:56.210 Auto accident alone in past year gets almost no coverage 00:10:56.490 --> 00:10:59.090 Now you can argue whether it's news or not 00:10:59.090 --> 00:11:02.419 The fact that a tesla automobile has been in an accident 00:11:02.430 --> 00:11:06.380 But it's also interesting how the article doesn't argue anything 00:11:06.840 --> 00:11:09.199 In favor of Tesla over a year ago 00:11:09.200 --> 00:11:14.539 Our first iteration of auto pilot was funded by the US government to reduce crash rates by as much as 40% 00:11:15.090 --> 00:11:20.569 Internal data confirms that recent updates to auto pilot have improved system rare reliability 00:11:21.030 --> 00:11:28.099 Obviously, there's not gonna be the perfect car. There's gonna be accidents no matter what it's just a matter of statistic 00:11:28.100 --> 00:11:30.469 It's unfortunate, but that's the reality of the situation 00:11:30.900 --> 00:11:35.869 but the fact that you have someone doing something good something positive something that saves life and 00:11:36.180 --> 00:11:39.460 still gets talked about in a negative light because 00:11:39.840 --> 00:11:46.280 journalists and media wants to generate more clicks the media who criticize nearly everyone is the only entity that 00:11:46.740 --> 00:11:51.680 Cannot be criticized whatsoever. Andrew Hawkins from verge says must continuously slow 00:11:51.680 --> 00:11:58.109 Try information into media baiting trump figures screaming irrationally about fake news. Hope this works out for you dude. Elon tweets back 00:11:58.110 --> 00:12:02.789 Thought you'd say that anytime anyone criticized the media. They media shrieks. You're just like Trump 00:12:02.789 --> 00:12:08.780 Why do you think he got elected in the first place? Because no one believes you anymore you lost your credibility a long time ago 00:12:09.140 --> 00:12:11.320 *LAZERS* Yeah. *MEME REVIEW CLAP* Tell'em Elon 00:12:11.620 --> 00:12:14.940 Journalists are under constant pressure to generate 'cliques' 00:12:15.490 --> 00:12:23.459 Otherwise, they get fired. So in the spirit of all this elan proposes a website called Pravda in a joking manner 00:12:24.130 --> 00:12:29.489 But I think he's actually serious where he- he made a poll saying let's create a media credibility 00:12:29.649 --> 00:12:33.689 rating site that also flags propaganda but net 88% votes 00:12:33.690 --> 00:12:38.099 Yes, I would be good 12 percent said no media is awesome 00:12:38.410 --> 00:12:42.690 "Amazingly the media is awesome vote is declining despite hundreds of articles" 00:12:43.480 --> 00:12:45.480 attacking this very poll 00:12:45.490 --> 00:12:51.630 The basic idea would "Pravda" way as I understand it is to rate how credible a journalist is kind of like 00:12:51.630 --> 00:12:53.440 I guess Rotten Tomatoes 00:12:53.440 --> 00:12:54.519 both 00:12:54.519 --> 00:13:01.078 Collects data on on movies and other reviews. Why can't we have that about news articles and game and journalists? 00:13:01.079 --> 00:13:04.679 It's an interesting idea. What do you think? Let me know. I 00:13:04.679 --> 00:13:05.709 PEWPEWPEWPEWPEWP- 00:13:05.709 --> 00:13:08.459 Want to give it big huge? 00:13:08.890 --> 00:13:13.829 thanks to everyone for standing up for me when media bullies you in a way that 00:13:14.380 --> 00:13:15.700 this happens 00:13:15.700 --> 00:13:17.620 the fact that people 00:13:17.620 --> 00:13:19.620 Take their time to explain 00:13:19.990 --> 00:13:25.979 Calmly and not not they're buying into this. Although it's just 9 year olds yelling at me 00:13:25.990 --> 00:13:32.760 It's really awesome to see so often these headlines are just an excuse for people to share around so they can say ha 00:13:32.760 --> 00:13:37.109 *angry anty-bro voice* I knew what he was a bad person. not really caring about what's true or not? 00:13:37.110 --> 00:13:41.820 So I really really appreciate that you guys stand up for me. It means a lot. Thank you very much 00:13:42.660 --> 00:13:43.840 Namaste and goodbye 00:13:43.840 --> 00:13:49.740 *jake paul song* 00:13:50.620 --> 00:13:56.820 Thank you PewDiePie for this amazing content! 00:13:59.980 --> 00:14:00.480 lol. y u watching this last 0.5 seconds