WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.199 --> 00:00:03.580
Scribble Kibble is your weekly cup of animation.

00:00:03.580 --> 00:00:09.530
I’m going to split this topic into two mugs.
For two episodes I’m going to ignore the

00:00:09.530 --> 00:00:15.160
methodology of the animation and instead talk
about writing because, as Chris wrote on the

00:00:15.160 --> 00:00:21.660
Zootopia episode, “Good writing can save
bad art. Good art can’t save bad writing.”

00:00:21.660 --> 00:00:26.550
Welcome to Good Writing Bad Writing. The featured
animation is Tiger.

00:00:26.550 --> 00:00:35.450
[sigh] Yes, we’re starting with bad writing.
But I promise I’ll make up for it next episode.

00:00:35.450 --> 00:00:39.500
First of all, I should mention that the animator,
Pernille Kjaer, is devoted to the type of

00:00:39.500 --> 00:00:45.360
art you expect to see in a modern art museum.
Aka: the weird stuff. In that respect, the

00:00:45.360 --> 00:00:50.540
animation does very well. It’s a confusing
mess of symbolism with no definitive meaning.

00:00:50.540 --> 00:00:50.920
Perfect.

00:00:50.920 --> 00:00:56.670
Yeah. Yeah, I get it now. It’s abstract
art, but animation. Like one of those films

00:00:56.670 --> 00:01:00.690
where you sit in a dark room and listen to
30 minutes of pops and clicks synced to images

00:01:00.690 --> 00:01:07.259
of colored smoke.

00:01:07.259 --> 00:01:11.079
But even that type of exhibit, there’s always
a little plaque where the artist talks about

00:01:11.079 --> 00:01:14.840
what they intended to make you feel or think,
and once you read that you can watch the movie

00:01:14.840 --> 00:01:21.209
and say, “Oh. I get it.” If you don’t
read the plaque, you still feel something.

00:01:21.209 --> 00:01:25.459
In terms of writing, Tiger fails to make us
feel anything other than confusion, and it

00:01:25.459 --> 00:01:30.039
defies interpretation. It’s the perfect
example of someone wanting to make people

00:01:30.039 --> 00:01:34.560
think in order to figure out what is going
on, but the final story is so contorted there

00:01:34.560 --> 00:01:36.959
is no way for us to find meaning in it.

00:01:36.959 --> 00:01:43.590
How to fix this? There are two paths to go
down. Path one: become more abstract. If the

00:01:43.590 --> 00:01:48.109
intention is to be abstract, then as a writer,
you need to decide what emotions you want

00:01:48.109 --> 00:01:52.409
viewers to feel throughout your film. Then
try to capture that emotion without using

00:01:52.409 --> 00:01:56.799
a narrative or conventional symbols. Symbols
have meaning. You don’t want that. You don’t

00:01:56.799 --> 00:02:01.029
want people’s biases getting in the way
of their experience of the raw emotion. That’s

00:02:01.029 --> 00:02:05.380
why a lot of abstract art boils down to shapes
and colors that look nothing like anything

00:02:05.380 --> 00:02:11.959
in real life.

00:02:11.959 --> 00:02:18.890
Path two: fix your story. The first way to
do this is let some people read your script

00:02:18.890 --> 00:02:22.989
and then tell you what they got out of the
story. If they get something out of it - even

00:02:22.989 --> 00:02:31.340
if it might not be what you expected - good.
If multiple people are confused or bored,

00:02:31.340 --> 00:02:34.530
then that is poor writing on your part. You
need to rewrite.

00:02:34.530 --> 00:02:39.700
I’m not going to pretend writing is easier
than animation. Writing is more accessible

00:02:39.700 --> 00:02:46.459
than animation. Animation requires tools and
knowledge, writing only requires knowledge.

00:02:46.459 --> 00:02:52.750
Many people can write. Only a few people can
write well. And only a few people can write

00:02:52.750 --> 00:02:57.439
well for animations.

00:02:57.439 --> 00:03:02.189
Going down the less abstract better writing
path, all that Tiger really needs is to be

00:03:02.189 --> 00:03:07.170
more clear. Even getting rid of the copy paste
beginning and ending would let us make up

00:03:07.170 --> 00:03:12.930
a meaning for the story. Because it’s there,
though, it implies that the whole cycle repeats

00:03:12.930 --> 00:03:14.340
itself.

00:03:14.340 --> 00:03:19.890
Let’s say Tiger is about a girl becoming
an independent person and unwittingly pushing

00:03:19.890 --> 00:03:25.459
her fat round friend Olav out of her life.
In that story, it doesn’t make sense that

00:03:25.459 --> 00:03:29.349
we would start over from the beginning. If
it repeats, it means none of the characters

00:03:29.349 --> 00:03:30.810
have learned anything.

00:03:30.810 --> 00:03:35.790
Gee, if you got rid of the Tiger part altogether
the story would be more clear and still have

00:03:35.790 --> 00:03:38.469
the open-to-interpretation feeling.

00:03:38.469 --> 00:03:45.890
What even is the tiger? The animation is called
Tiger so it’s probably important. If the

00:03:45.890 --> 00:03:50.829
Tiger is the girl’s creativity or independence
or imagination, then it makes sense that she

00:03:50.829 --> 00:03:52.519
can’t kill it permanently.

00:03:52.519 --> 00:03:57.150
Or perhaps she could. The ending would be
her alone in the kitchen with a dead plant.

00:03:57.150 --> 00:04:01.989
Her friend Olav is gone, and she killed the
wild part of herself that made him leave.

00:04:01.989 --> 00:04:03.859
The end.

00:04:03.859 --> 00:04:10.189
And that’s how you can mess up an entire
story with a poorly written ending. If we

00:04:10.189 --> 00:04:10.599
mapped out the story, it’d look like this:
rising action as the girl discovers the cube

00:04:10.599 --> 00:04:10.739
plant and it starts taking over the world.
Growing tension between these three characters.

00:04:10.739 --> 00:04:10.900
Climax, where Olav attacks the plant and it
eats him, forcing the girl to act. Slowed

00:04:10.900 --> 00:04:11.040
pacing leads to discovering Olav’s dead
body, slight bump in action when the Tiger

00:04:11.040 --> 00:04:11.170
non-aggressively plays with the girl and she
decides to kill it, utter confusion.

00:04:11.170 --> 00:04:14.370
Ugh. I can’t try to make sense out of Tiger
anymore. It’s making me frustrated.

00:04:14.370 --> 00:04:19.910
Good art can’t save bad writing. And this
is bad writing.

00:04:19.910 --> 00:04:24.600
Scribble Kibble, the show where I’ve given
up on watching confusing cartoons and instead

00:04:24.600 --> 00:04:25.800
eat dog food.

00:04:25.800 --> 00:04:30.520
Wolves don’t bark. They bork. Bork! Bork!
Bork!

00:04:30.520 --> 00:04:36.280
My blah reaction to today’s animation. And…
my happiness at what I have in store next

00:04:36.280 --> 00:04:36.700
week. Eeee!

